Definition: And he did [that which was] evil in the sight of the LORD, but not as the kings of Israel that were before him.
Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 17:2. It's a really important and somewhat complex passage about God’s plan for the future of Israel. Here’s a simple explanation: What it means: This verse is saying that after promising to send messengers to Egypt, God didn't actually do what he promised. He didn't send those messengers; instead, he allowed things to happen that were bad and frightening for the people of Israel. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “And he did [that which was] evil in the sight of the LORD…” – This is a big word! “Evil” here doesn't mean something inherently bad, but rather unrightful or wrong . It suggests actions that go against God’s will and are causing harm. "...but not as the kings of Israel that were before him." – This is the crucial part. God wasn’t sending messengers to Egypt; he was sending messengers to Egypt . The “kings of Israel” refers to the rulers of the kingdom in the north, who were known for their power and often made decisions that weren't always just or right. So, what happened? The verse describes a period where God allowed a series of events – including the rise of idolatry (worshiping other gods) and a general lack of obedience – to occur in Israel. It was a time of instability and potential disaster. It wasn’t a sudden, dramatic event, but rather a gradual descent into trouble. Why is this important? This verse is often seen as a warning about the dangers of: Idolatry: Worshiping anything other than God. Disobedience: Ignoring God's laws and commands. Lack of Faith: Not believing in God’s plan and leading to instability. In essence, it’s a reminder that God is in control and that even when things seem chaotic or difficult, He is working for good, even if we don't always understand how. --- Do you want me to: Explain any of these concepts further? Give an example of what "evil" might look like based on this verse? Discuss the significance of this passage within the context of the Old Testament?